The Voynich Manuscript
The Voynich Manuscript is without a doubt the 'holy grail' of cryptographers and linguists around the globe. Produced likely in the late 15th century, it is an illustrated collection of approximately 246 pages written in some unknown language or script, the papers have become an enigmatic bane to those who call historical cryptography their discipline. Since its introduction into the mainstream of the scientific community roughly around 1915, attempts to translate the manuscript have proved fruitless. Priests, historians, linguists and even code breakers from World War II, all of whom were eventually defeated by the mysterious manuscript, have studied it vigilantly.
But that is not to say that their have not been numerous theories and alleged 'solutions' to the document with the earliest modern of these dating back to 1919, with claims that it was actually the work of 13th century empiricist Roger Bacon, who was well versed in the fields of languages and astrology. But alas, such theories have been proven and disprove countless times over and it is likely that the document will forever remain shrouded in mystery.
And what of it do we know? Unfortunately, the history of the manuscript is filled with several holes, and it is even more than evident that there are also pages missing from the document itself. The best place to start, however, is with its introduction to the world at large by a Polish book-dealer and antiquarian named Wilfred Voynich of whom the manuscript gets its name. Acquired along with thirty other manuscripts and documents, the piece quickly became a jewel in his collection, passing to his widow after his death. The Voynich Manuscript now lies in the possession of Yale University and summaries of each page can be found here.
The language that is written within the document is said to be alphabetical in nature, containing anywhere from nineteen to twenty-eight characters, none of which bear any resemblance to the European lettering system. It appears, by all accounts, to also follow the principles of Zipf's Laws regarding natural language, and also seems to adhere to some sort of phonetic law as well. This has led many proclaim that it is proof of the manuscripts authenticity but again, nothing has been proven.
Only a handful of the pages contain solely the mysterious text, the rest being filled abundantly with odd drawings and illustrations: unidentified plants, charts containing objects that seem to be things that should require telescopes and microscopes to be seen, herbal recipes, etc. Judging from the placement of such pictures, scholars on the subject have divide the manuscript into six distinct 'chapters,' one of the oddest, in my mind, being the section dubbed 'Biological.' Within it, the illustrations mostly show series of naked women bathing in tubs of a sort that are connected by plumbing that resembles, in most cases, organs in the human anatomy.
As of yet, there have been no definitive translations of the Voynich Manuscript, though claims certainly have been made but the lack of any sort of progress has led many to dismiss it as an elaborate hoax, either being a 16th century forgery or by Voynich's own hand. The latter of these has more or less been disproved by expert dating of the document and letters from the 17th century that reference it.
This much, however, is certain: hoax or not, the power that this collection of pages has held over the cryptographic community has been staggering. One would be a fool to think that the possibility of unlocking the potential mysteries they possess will be drawing code breakers and linguists of all kinds to it's alluring scripts and illustration for years to come.





















Comments
Thanks for posting this. A
Thanks for posting this.
A quick look at the text on one of the pages on Wikipedia had me scratching my head... the same 'word' was often repeated several times in a row, and lots of other 'words' were so similar as to appear suspect. Of course part of the encryption could involved deleting some of the 'words', they could be placeholders or directives about the encryption. Still, for what it's worth, it 'felt' like I was reading something akin to what Bart Simpson finished writing on the chalkboard. And, the wierd plants, naked bathing lovelies, everything drawn a bit cartoonishly... to me, it felt like gibberish.
However I don't think it is a hoax in the normal sense. Arguments for it being a hoax include the repeated words, and the fact that none of the plants correlate directly with any real known plants. Arguments for it being legitimate are the real age of the document and its provenance, the complexity of the document, and the statistical correlation with Zipf's law.
I would like to offer an alternative explanation.
Imagine you are an alchemist. You have a very difficult job. You have to be working towards achieving the impossible, while convincing someone to invest in your ability to do that. You do chemical experiments, you write everything down, you try to produce some tangible results... And you had better write everything in code lest someone steal your secrets and destroy your career, all your hard work.
The first known owner of the manuscript was an alchemist in Prague in the early 17th century, who apparently didn't understand it and had some disdain for it for taking up space in his library. : ) But it's easy to see how he may have acquired it from some recently deceased or retired alchemist, or some pseudo-scientist of the day, hoping that it held information he could use in his work.
I'm of the opinion the document was produced by an alchemist or other pseudo-scientist to deceive his contemporaries or his benefactors that he was doing real work. Basically, a con man of the era. He may have been purporting himself to be a doctor, or naturalist. I would hazard a guess that there was no shortage of quacks capitalizing on the populace's (and the wealthy's) fascination with Naturalism and alchemy at the time. A document like this would be pretty impressive to some duke or duchess interested in employing a man of Science.
'Indeed sir, I have recorded my discoveries using a Sifer I have devised myself, which no man can solve. Let your best man try! Ah I see my sketch of this strange flowering plant has caught your eye. Quite unique, I studied it while consulting with a colleauge on a sojourn to Africa. It has amazing properties we have yet to learn of here on the continent. Alas, the samples I collected were stolen by bandits on the return journey, but I have yet a few seeds that I may be able to bring to life, with the proper funding of course....'
I have thought a lot about
I have thought a lot about this doccument and I came to the same conclusion. Although there is a mathmatical algorithm that implies the text contains language, little else suggests this. It looks like a "doctors book" from the period but the knowlege inside is all wrong. The plants in the botanical section for example are not real species.
The most compelling thing I found was that other fake books from this area and timeframe exist. Just as glmuskie posits in his post above, quack doctors and alchemists carried these books around to impress the overwhelmingly illiterate population. At the time this book was made, books had an almost supernatural power. Books contained fantastical knowlege that only a few wise and ellite people could decipher.
Still, what a great mystery.
Awesome theory, GL. :-
Awesome theory, GL. :- )
Don't know if that was the case here, but I have no doubt that some 'freaky phenomena' are due to precisely this: a con man took a shot at it, and the con man who got luckiest produced an interesting puzzle for posterity.