Freaky Phenomena

Weird news from around the world, from crop circles to frog rain

The Voynich Manuscript

Subscribe to Comments for "The Voynich Manuscript"

Replies

glmuskie's picture
Submitted by glmuskie on

Thanks for posting this.

A quick look at the text on one of the pages on Wikipedia had me scratching my head... the same 'word' was often repeated several times in a row, and lots of other 'words' were so similar as to appear suspect. Of course part of the encryption could involved deleting some of the 'words', they could be placeholders or directives about the encryption. Still, for what it's worth, it 'felt' like I was reading something akin to what Bart Simpson finished writing on the chalkboard. And, the wierd plants, naked bathing lovelies, everything drawn a bit cartoonishly... to me, it felt like gibberish.

However I don't think it is a hoax in the normal sense. Arguments for it being a hoax include the repeated words, and the fact that none of the plants correlate directly with any real known plants. Arguments for it being legitimate are the real age of the document and its provenance, the complexity of the document, and the statistical correlation with Zipf's law.

I would like to offer an alternative explanation.

Imagine you are an alchemist. You have a very difficult job. You have to be working towards achieving the impossible, while convincing someone to invest in your ability to do that. You do chemical experiments, you write everything down, you try to produce some tangible results... And you had better write everything in code lest someone steal your secrets and destroy your career, all your hard work.

The first known owner of the manuscript was an alchemist in Prague in the early 17th century, who apparently didn't understand it and had some disdain for it for taking up space in his library. : ) But it's easy to see how he may have acquired it from some recently deceased or retired alchemist, or some pseudo-scientist of the day, hoping that it held information he could use in his work.

I'm of the opinion the document was produced by an alchemist or other pseudo-scientist to deceive his contemporaries or his benefactors that he was doing real work. Basically, a con man of the era. He may have been purporting himself to be a doctor, or naturalist. I would hazard a guess that there was no shortage of quacks capitalizing on the populace's (and the wealthy's) fascination with Naturalism and alchemy at the time. A document like this would be pretty impressive to some duke or duchess interested in employing a man of Science.

'Indeed sir, I have recorded my discoveries using a Sifer I have devised myself, which no man can solve. Let your best man try! Ah I see my sketch of this strange flowering plant has caught your eye. Quite unique, I studied it while consulting with a colleauge on a sojourn to Africa. It has amazing properties we have yet to learn of here on the continent. Alas, the samples I collected were stolen by bandits on the return journey, but I have yet a few seeds that I may be able to bring to life, with the proper funding of course....'

RodeoX's picture
Submitted by RodeoX on

I have thought a lot about this doccument and I came to the same conclusion. Although there is a mathmatical algorithm that implies the text contains language, little else suggests this.  It looks like a "doctors book" from the period but the knowlege inside is all wrong. The plants in the botanical section for example are not real species. 

The most compelling thing I found was that other fake books from this area and timeframe exist. Just as glmuskie posits in his post above, quack doctors and alchemists carried these books around to impress the overwhelmingly illiterate population.  At the time this book was made, books had an almost supernatural power. Books contained fantastical knowlege that only a few wise and ellite people could decipher.

Still, what a great mystery.

jemanji's picture
Submitted by jemanji on

Awesome theory, GL. :- )

Don't know if that was the case here, but I have no doubt that some 'freaky phenomena' are due to precisely this: a con man took a shot at it, and the con man who got luckiest produced an interesting puzzle for posterity.

Leave a Reply

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.