Tupac Comes Back From The Dead - As A Hologram
Fans of JRR Tolkien are familiar with “Orcs,” the monstrous humanoid thugs of Sauron and Saruman. And fans of a host of lesser fantasies and role-playing games are familiar with them too, often in rather silly permutations. If you've read “The Hobbit” as well as “Lord of the Rings,” you know that Tolkien's Orcs were originally referred to as goblins. But what is a goblin, exactly?
In traditional European folklore, there are a variety of “fairy” races, including the aristocratic “Daoine Sidhe” of Ireland (who are much like Tolkien's elves), kobolds (who work deep in underground mines), seal-people, dwarfs, water-horses, river maidens and so on.
There isn't really any cut-and-dry definition of what a goblin is, but essentially they are small and ugly fairy creatures and are usually mischievous at best or downright malevolent at worst. In Scottish fairy-lore, all sorts of fairy creatures are portrayed as being either “seelie” or “unseelie.” Seelie fairies are perilous but not bad as such, while unseelie fairies are bad all the way through. Goblins would definitely fit into the unseelie category, but their badness is more often petty than downright evil. The goblins in “Labyrinth” are pretty close to the folklore conception, while their king in the movie (played by David Bowie) is more like an elf or a Sidhe. Tolkien's goblins in “The Hobbit” are more like folklore goblins than his Orcs in “Lord of the Rings,” particularly his Uruk-Hai or “soldier Orcs” which are rather more imposing than traditional goblins.
As reported in the BBC News, five people have been arrested in China after a teenager there sold his kidney for $3,000, enough to purchase an iPad and iPhone. The teenage boy, a youth from the Hunan province of southern China, was reported to the authorities by his mother, who noticed the new electronics. When she asked where he got the money for them, he said he had sold his kidney. The teenager is now reportedly in renal failure, in a Hunan hospital. The group that has been detained, which includes the surgeon that performed the operation, earned an estimated $35,000 for the kidney, according to state-run Xin-Hua News.
The popularity of iPads and iPods in China have leveraged the price of them above the reach of most urban workers. As such they’ve turned into a major status symbol, particularly among the youth of urban areas. This leads to increasingly extreme acts in order to procure them (think the shootings for Nike Air Jordan tennis shoes in the U.S.). At the same time, there is a critical organ shortage in China, 150 times the need of what is actually being provided within that country. Though 1.5 million are in need of an organ transplant of one type or another, yet only about 10,000 procedures are performed annually. China has worked to alleviate this extreme shortage of viable organs by harvesting them from executed prisoners. However, the country ahs recently announced that this practice will end within the next five years.
This single incident is evidence of a growing confluence of challenges within China; those inherent within a country of nearly 2 billion people and those that are a result of a gradually capitalizing economy with a staggering potential middle class. As more Chinese see the fruits of a burgeoning middle class, they will strive for the same social status, the same trappings of that status (like iPads and iPods), and the same medical benefits (such as organ transplants). As the U.S. looks to China as its primary competition on the global stage, we should understand that China has its own very real challenges, very real obstacles to competition. How that nation responds to those challenges will decide their place in a globally competitive market.
We've all heard of brainwashing, but is it actually real? Can people be hypnotized or manipulated into acting against their own core values or best interests? The whole concept of brainwashing comes from the Korean War, when some American POWs made pro-communist statements or even refused to come home after the war was over. Of course, there were several reasonable explanations for this. Some of them could already have been communists- communism had a lot of American adherents at one point. Or the soldiers could have been tortured or starved or intimidated into making those statements. Or a few soldiers could honestly have been “converted” to communism through conversations with their guards.
That last explanation was the one that scared the government. At the height of the Cold War, the idea that anyone would actually choose to become a communist in preference to the American capitalist system was extremely threatening. So they come up with the explanation of “brainwashing,” a kind of hypnotic mind control achieved through sensory deprivation, humiliation and constant pressure.
Under the circumstances, the whole idea should be treated with some skepticism, but such techniques do exist, and may have been attempted by the North Koreans. The question is, are they effective? Most of the soldiers who experienced such techniques shook them off pretty quickly once they were freed and sent home. Cult groups try to use similar techniques, but most people who join a cult don't stay in it for all that long. This alone implies that the brainwashing can't be all that effective.
What I would suggest is that group-think is a dangerous reality, but that brainwashing in any other sense is not. In other words, if you choose to embrace the ideology of a particular group, you can then get caught up in a self-reinforcing network of conformity and uniformity of opinion that slowly leads you to abandon all your critical thinking skills and stop thinking for yourself at all, sometimes with tragic results. But no one can impose this on you against your will- if you don't make the initial decision to embrace the group ideology, no one can brainwash you into doing so.
These days, everyone wants to talk about what they would do if there was a zombie apocalypse. Of course, this question cannot really be answered without first answering a few other questions: are these slow zombies (Night of the Living Dead) or fast zombies (28 Days Later), fresh bodies only (Night of the Living Dead) or ancient corpses (Zombie 2) or even evil Knights Templar (Tombs of the Blind Dead), flesh-eaters (Night of the Living Dead) or brain-eaters (Return of the Living Dead), and is this a case of “kill the head, kill the ghoul” (Night of the Living Dead) or do all the severed body parts keep coming back for more (Evil Dead)?
You see, I was a zombie movie fan 10 or 15 years before everybody else was, and one thing any longtime zombie movie fan can tell you is that there is no standardized set of “rules.” But for the sake of discussion, let's assume a classic “Night of the Living Dead” zombie apocalypse scenario: slow zombies, fresh bodies only, flesh-eaters, kill the head, kill the ghoul.
In this situation, what kind of weapon do you want? You can go with a pistol, a rifle, a shotgun, a machete, a sword or a club of some kind. Here's what I think about each option:
Club- heads don't break as easily as you might think from watching zombie movies.
Pistol- most people don't shoot very accurately under pressure.
Rifle- this is really a long-distance weapon, and zombies are a close-distance threat.
Sword- good for chopping off zombie heads, but cutting effectively with a sword requires prior training and swords need a lot of TLC if you're carting them around as you wander through the zombie-infested wastelands.
Machete- nice wide blade makes for relatively easy chopping, but blood splatter could lead to infection. In most zombie movies, the tiniest bite means inevitable doom but getting drenched head to toe in zombie blood is no problem at all. However, that makes no sense so I think we can assume blood splatter would be an issue. Still, you need an option for when your gun is out of ammo, and machetes are widely available and low-maintenance.
Shotgun- close-distance, user-friendly, head-blasting power! You don't need to be a sharpshooter to blast a zombie's head off with one of these.
As you can see from this analysis, the ideal combo in case of a zombie apocalypse is a shotgun with machete back-up. Now you know!